The Next 50 Tech Hubs

Having just listed the world’s top 50 science and technology hubs, based on data from Visual Capitalist, here are the next 50 science and technology hubs, i.e. rated 51 to 100 (the grey dots mark the top 50 hubs previously blogged).

The hubs in China once again dominate in scientific publications, defined by the cited study to be peer-reviewed articles published in the Social Sciences Citation Index or Science Citation Index Expanded (this does not, of course, take account of publication quality). Hubs in the USA and Europe dominate in patent applications (both effects are statistically significant at p < 1%).

Once again, diamonds show the 13 hubs containing one or more major solar car teams, such as Innoptus in the Brussels–Antwerp area, Michigan in Ann Arbor, CUER in Cambridge, ITU in Istanbul, Chalmers in Göteborg, Team Arrow in Brisbane, or Éclipse and Esteban in Montreal. With the 18 hubs in the top 50, that make 31 out of the top 100 hubs with solar car teams (apologies if I’ve missed anybody – I intended to include all WSC, ASC, and ESC teams).

The table summarises numbers by region:

Region Top 50 Second 50 Total
Europe 14 15 29
Mainland China 12 11 23
USA 12 9 21
Other East Asia 8 3 11
Australia 2 1 3
Canada 0 4 4
India 0 4 4
Israel 1 0 1
Iran 1 0 1
Turkey 0 2 2
Brazil 0 1 1

The Top 50 Tech Hubs

Above is a chart of the world’s top 50 science and technology hubs, using data from Visual Capitalist, coloured by region (some names are abbreviated). Notice that Mainland China is dominating on scientific publications (statistically significant at p < 0.1%).

Diamonds show the 18 (36% of) hubs containing one or more major solar car teams, such as Brunel Solar Team (Delft) within the Amsterdam–Rotterdam hub, or Stanford and CalSol within the SF Bay Area (apologies if I’ve missed anybody – I intended to include all WSC, ASC, and ESC teams). Solar car teams are a good indicator of a sophisticated but practical high-tech culture, occurring more often in the hubs with more patents.

The table summarises numbers by region:

Region Number Percent
Europe 14 28%
USA 12 24%
Mainland China 12 24%
Other Asia 8 16%
Australia 2 4%
Israel 1 2%
Iran 1 2%

Solar Car World Rankings

There seems to be a demand among solar car teams for a “Solar Car World Championship.” Above is my best attempt at such a thing. It is based on rankings from these 4 races which I cover:

  • BWSC 23 – ranks for other races were adjusted to be compatible with BWSC results
  • ASC 22 – ranks were increased by 5
  • Sasol 22 – ranks were doubled
  • iESC 22 – ranks were raised to the 1.5 power

Only Challenger cars were included (I do not have enough information to rank Cruisers), and only teams racing in two or more races were included (thus Michigan, a truly fantastic team, is excluded). Overall rankings shown in the chart were based on the average of the results for each team’s best 2 races. Here they are as text:


BWSC: Innovations

Looking back on the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge, I wanted to highlight some technical innovations in a number of different areas. As always, click images to zoom.

Teams, please message me if I’ve gotten anything wrong.

Electrical

Top Dutch always sets a great example in being open. Below is their very professional battery box (they also received the Safety Award). Estidamah also shared their battery box, designed with safety in mind:


Top Dutch’s battery box (left, credit: Anthony Dekker) and Estidamah’s (right, credit: Anthony Dekker)

Top Dutch also used cutting-edge perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells from Oxford PV (sadly damaged in a pre-race accident). These cells offer a roughly 20% higher efficiency than standard silicon, and in spite of the damage, the team still came 6th.


Top Dutch’s solar panel (credit: Anthony Dekker)

It is also worth noting that the top 4 Challenger teams (Leuven, Twente, Delft, and Michigan) all used silicon-anode batteries from Amprius.

Steering, Motors, and Suspension

Delft/Brunel this year had an asymmetrical three-wheel car (as they did in 2021), steered by the front and side wheels. The steering wheel connects via a belt to a central rotating rod, which in turn connects to each wheel:


Delft’s Nuna 12 and interior showing steering (left credit: John Inglis, right: Anthony Dekker)

Kogakuin University Solar Team is always a powerhouse of innovation. Their car this year had revolutionary movable rear wheels. Bringing the rear wheels forward (and further apart) improves stability. They also had an unusual nonlinear suspension. The team reports:

“There is no need for an internal beam to hang the suspension, so the car has more living space. Because the suspension is supported from the ground chassis, it has a low center of gravity. It is installed on a round rail and can rotate the tire in any direction. This is the unit that includes the electric motor, suspension, etc. Easily integrated into the flat base chassis of electric vehicles. When multiple units are installed in a car, their suspensions are hydraulically connected to each other, and it also has a function that maintains the vehicle body angle at a constant angle to improve ride comfort and aerodynamic performance.”


Kogakuin’s suspension system – hydraulic tubes are visible on the right (left credit: team, right: Anthony Dekker)

Deakin/Ascend’s Cruiser had an innovative 3D-printed titanium upright in their suspension, and for ease of access and other reasons used a pair of electric aircraft motors from Slovenian company Emrax:


Deakin’s titanium upright and motors (credit: John Inglis)

Solaride’s Cruiser also had a Slovenian motor, from GEM.

Aerodynamics & Body

The Belgian team credits their famous retractable and rotatable fin both with increasing speed during side winds and with improving stability. They received the The CSIRO Technical Innovation Award for this and other features. They say (my translation):

“It is not only the energy efficiency that gives us a competitive advantage. Thanks to the fin, the car drives more stably in crosswinds. During the WSC, the solar car was able to maintain its speed where other teams had to slow down.”


The famous fin at the finish line (credit: Anthony Dekker)

Jönköping University (JU) made their body from sustainable flax fibre. They say:

“Flax fiber is lighter than carbon fiber, which means our car will have less weight and better performance. In addition, flax fiber is a renewable resource and biodegradable, making it more environmentally friendly than carbon fiber. Another advantage of the material is its high strength and stiffness, making it a suitable option for reinforcing and stabilizing the car body. This is particularly important given the challenges of the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge 2023. Flax fiber has the ability to resist vibrations and shocks better than carbon fiber, making it a safer material for the body. … In summary, flax fiber is a relatively new material for solar cars and other vehicles, and there is still some uncertainty about its performance and durability over time. Despite this, we at JU Solar Team have chosen to use flax fiber for our new solar car, and we are convinced that it is the best choice for us.”


JU’s flax-fibre body (credit: Anthony Dekker)

Command and Control

I am using military terminology deliberately here, because leading a solar car convoy through the desert has certain similarities with leading a military team.

Chalmers has used the what3words geocode system for error-resistant communication of location information (on this system, the famous Three Rivers Fountain would be coded as “former.even.photo”). It should be noted, however, that this system has its critics, and it may work better for text communication than for voice. I understand that this was also the team’s experience.

Sunswift has more or less re-invented what the military calls “reach-back” – and congratulations to them for doing so!

“Reach-back support is a relatively new concept. It provides operational warfighting units – battalions and brigades – the opportunity to reach outside of their traditional avenues of information flow and use national intelligence community assets to gather information to fill ‘gaps’ in tactical intelligence.” (Capt. Phillip Radzikowsk, 2008, ‘Reach-Back’—A New Approach To Asymmetrical Warfare Intelligence)

The Sunswift “Racecube,” back in Sydney, receives live telemetry that is processed by data analysts and strategists. These in turn provide advice back to the decision-makers in the chase vehicle. The result is a strategy team much bigger than would fit in the back of a van. Of course, this is only possible through satellite communication.


Sunswift’s “Racecube” (credit: team)


BWSC: Friday recap

Just like that, the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge is over. Above (click to zoom) is a chart of control stop times for Challenger-class cars. The numbers after each team are average speeds over the whole race in km/h. The right-hand axis shows arrival times in Adelaide (but in Darwin time).

Update: there have been some minor changes on the BWSC website. Final Challenger-class rankings are:

  • 1. Leuven (#8)
  • 2. Twente (#21)
  • 3. Delft (#3)
  • 4. Michigan (#2)
  • 5. Tokai (#10)
  • 6. Top Dutch (#6)
  • 7. JU (#46)
  • 8. Kogakuin (#88)
  • 9. West Syd (#15)
  • 10. Eclipse (#92)
  • 11. Durham (#20)
  • 12. αCentauri (#85)
  • 13. Aachen (#7)
  • 14. Goko (#37)
  • 15. Blue Sky (#77)
  • 16. Chalmers (#51)
  • 17. Adelaide (#9)
  • 18. HUST (#23)
  • 19. Wadaisolar (#61)
  • 20. ITU (#34)
  • 21. ANU (#41)
  • 22. Arrow (#13)
  • 23. Solis (#99)
  • EcoPhoton (#18)
  • AgniRath (#28)
  • SOLO (#57)
  • SAITEM (#82)
  • Estidamah (#93)

Cruisers

Cruiser-class scores will depend on practicality judging.

Update: Here are the final rankings:

  • 1. Sunswift (#27), the winner, with 83.3% practicality and total score 91.1
  • 2. Minnesota (#35), with 72.6% practicality and total score 22.4
  • 3. Solaride (#66), with 71.8% practicality and total score 14.7 (also the Prohelion Scrutineer’s Choice Award)
  • 4. Apollo (#95), ranking second in practicality at 73.5% (total score was 13.5)
  • 5. Beijing (#80), with total score 5.3
  • 6. Deakin (#67), ranking third in practicality at 72.8% (also the Bridgestone E8 award)
  • Flinders (#30) – did not reach Tennant Creek
  • Siam (#49) – did not reach Tennant Creek
  • Futuro solare (#14) – did not start
  • Sophie (#25) – did not start

In more detail (these numbers are copied directly from the official website):

Team Person-km Grid energy (kWh) Lateness (min) On-road score Practicality Final score
Sunswift (#27) 3940 36   109.4 83.3% 91.1
Minnesota (#35) 1970 37.9 52 30.8 72.6% 22.4
Solaride (#66) 1617 41 65 20.5 71.8% 14.7
Apollo (#95) 1970 56.5 64 18.3 73.5% 13.5
Beijing (#80) 985 29 127 9.5 56.2% 5.3
Deakin (#67) 985 56.5 94 6.8 72.8% 4.9
Flinders (#30) 0 51.3   0 66.8% 0
Siam (#49) 0 99.1   0 60.1% 0
Futuro solare (#14) 0 18.8   0 57.8% 0
Sophie (#25) 0 45.7   0 58.8% 0


BWSC: Thursday recap

Day 5 of the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge is over. Above (click to zoom) is a chart of control stop times for Challenger-class cars. Team names pointing left are sadly out of the race. The numbers after each team are speeds in km/h, either averages over the whole race or (in brackets) over the last leg. The right-hand axis shows arrival times in Adelaide (but in Darwin time – add an hour for Adelaide time, and perhaps another 20 minutes for cross-city transfer). Open circles show predicted arrivals (based on average speed for last leg).


First four cars. Credit: Anthony Dekker

Four teams have crossed the finish line in Adelaide:

  • 1st: Innoptus/Leuven from Belgium (#8)
  • 2nd: Twente from the Netherlands (#21)
  • 3rd: Brunel/Delft from the Netherlands (#3)
  • 4th: Michigan from the USA (#2)

Congratulations to all four teams! Tokai from Japan (#10) is also just in (5th), but will cross the ceremonial finish line tomorrow morning. Much sadder news is that Sonnenwagen Aachen (#7) is out of the race. They report:

“Adelie had an accident, but the driver and everyone else is SAFE AND UNHARMED, which is all that matters right now!

After Port Augusta, the last control stop before Adelaide, the roads were more crowded and after a situation with two consecutive road trains passing, we lost control of Adelie. She came off the road and rolled over at the ditch next to it. Everybody reacted immediately, and we can’t stress enough how happy we are with the final outcome of this dangerous and unfortunate situation.

Due to race regulations, we are disqualified from the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge after tipping over, but our team spirit remained as unharmed as our driver, and the first shock is over.”


BWSC: Sunday recap

Day 1 of the Bridgestone World Solar Challenge is done. Below is a chart of cars that started on Sunday morning, and an updated weather forecast. Above is a chart of control stop times for Challenger-class cars. There is some clever strategy going on at the top end. Excessive speed drains energy: just increasing from 90 km/h to 95 km/h draws 18% more power. But Brunel/Delft has indicated that they were running hard to get away from clouds (clouds are poison in solar car racing). A fire just past Katherine also added drama to the race. Some other teams to note are listed below.


Through the fire, or at least through the smoke. Credit: Solar Team Twente

Michigan (#2)

Michigan had hot-lap problems on Saturday. Some good decisions and hard work staved off disaster, but they still were forced to start last. They did a lot of overtaking, and clawed their way back to 6th. They have posted some pictures on their social media (click the icons).

Solis-EV (#99)

The Romanians have had more than their fair share of drama, arriving at Darwin just in the nick of time. The did not reach Katherine, but I believe that they are still in the race. They have posted some pictures on their social media (click the icons).

Team Arrow (#13)

Sadly, Team Arrow is out of the race.


Cars starting on Sunday. Credits: 2, 6, 9, 13, 21, 30, 34, 37, 46, 61, 77, 99: John Inglis; 80: Roslyn Jan


BWSC: Sunday midday

The Bridgestone World Solar Challenge is under way (see my annotated teams list). The charts above show race leaders in the two classes (Cruisers are ranked by points, not just speed). Photos are by John Inglis and, as usual, click images to zoom.


BWSC: Hot laps

The Bridgestone World Solar Challenge is under way. Dynamic scrutineering was on today, with the road race itself starting on Sunday. See my constantly updated annotated teams list. The chart above shows times for the “hot laps” which determine starting order for the road race (Cruiser-class cars are marked in blue). I am not quite sure what went wrong for HK team Sophie (#25), who had a lap time of over 7 minutes. Missing from the chart are:

  • Michigan (#2) who had an electrical fault at just the wrong time, and will therefore start at the tail of the pack tomorrow.
  • SAITEM (#82) from Turkey and Solis (#99) from Romania, who have only just passed last-minute static scrutineering.
  • Five teams which have not passed static scrutineering.

Pictures

As usual, click to zoom.


Group picture – click to zoom (photo: John Inglis)


The Belgians (#8) get 2nd place, and a new personal best (photo: team)


Brunel/Delft (#3) get 3rd place, and also a new personal best (photo: lightatwork)


Top Dutch (#6) get 4th place (photo: John Inglis)


Tokai (#10) get 7th place (photo: John Inglis)


Twente (#21) get 11th place (photo: John Inglis)


Sophie (#25) only arrived yesterday, but were able to finish scrutineering today, even though their “hot lap” was a little lukewarm (photo: John Inglis)


Team Arrow (#13) managed to finish their car at the track and still qualify (photo: John Inglis)


Michigan (#2) qualified, but electrical gremlins meant that they did not do a hot lap, and therefore start at the tail of the pack on Sunday. Note also their last-minute white top (photo: John Inglis)


Solis (#99) from Romania arrived with Sophie on Friday (photo: John Inglis)


This gorgeous Italian Cruiser (#14) will sadly not be in the race (photo: John Inglis)


BWSC: Tension mounts

The Bridgestone World Solar Challenge has arrived. Scrutineering is well under way, and the race itself starts on Sunday October 22nd. Friday 20th will see static scrutineering finish. So far, 25 cars have passed the requisite checks (my constantly updated annotated teams list marks teams that have passed with a double green tick). Saturday 21st will see dynamic scrutineering at the racetrack. Tension is building as that day approaches. Teams are doing different things:

Gunn Point Road

Several teams are getting more race practice at Gunn Point Road.


Deakin University (#67) at Gunn Point Road (photo: John Inglis)


The Belgians (#8) practice a tyre change (photo: John Inglis)


Drivers are ballasted up to 80 kg, which means that switching drivers changes also means switching ballast bags. Here Chalmers (#51) practises the manoeuvre (photo: John Inglis)


Delft’s Nuna 12 (#3) clocks up more kilometres (photo: @Lightatwork)

Dynamics practice

Dynamic scrutineering at the racetrack on Saturday will see figure-8 tests and braking tests, as well as a “hot lap” to determine the start position for the race. Several teams are practising for this.


Twente (#21) practises the figure-8 (photo: John Inglis)


The Apollo team (#95) with their beautiful Cruiser (photo: John Inglis)

Static scrutineering

A bit under half the teams are in scrutineering, or preparing for scrutineering tomorrow. Four cars are still on their way to Darwin, I understand.


Wadaisolar (#61) on the scrutineering floor. Note the large display with the red/green scrutineering spreadsheet in the background (photo: team)


The Malaysians (#18) went through hell to get to Darwin. Here they are working on their car in their tent (photo: John Inglis)


Istanbul Technical University (#34) are watched over by Atatürk, father of the Turkish nation, as they work on their car. They passed static scrutineering today (photo: John Inglis)


SAITEM (#82), the other Turkish team, were a late arrival (photo: John Inglis)


Team Arrow (#13) arrived with an incomplete car. At last report, they had 4 out of the required 11 green stickers (photo: John Inglis)