All too soon, the 24-hour iLumen European Solar Challenge is over. The charts above and below (click to zoom) show results from the live timing board. The winners of the two classes (Challenger and CR = Cruiser) will be decided on points scores, which are still to come. Meanwhile, however, the German teams from Aachen and Bochum deserve special congratulations. For updates, see also the race social media at
Update 1: there are apparently no official results yet. All that has been released has been the podiums:
- Challenger: 1. Covestro Photon (Aachen), 2. Covestro Sonnenwagen (Aachen), 3. RED E (Twente)
- Cruiser: 1. Lodz, 2. Onda Solare, 3. Stella Era (Eindhoven)
Using the guidelines in the official regulations, I can calculate the Challenger class scores (see below).
Update 2: the official results have now been released, and I have added the chart below. Bochum seems to have lost out from having a two-seater car. For the rest, practicality judging makes up 40% of the final Cruiser score at iESC, so that Lodz essentially won on practicality (although I note that four of the Cruisers raced in Australia in 2019, and I would have expected both practicality and efficiency scores at Zolder to have been somewhat similar).
Pingback: Italian Solar Challenge 2022 | Scientific Gems
thanks for your coverage! I found detailed results here:
Maybe you can visualize them nicely like you usually do.
Thank you. I was looking for that. I note that the format has changed since last time, which means I’d have to rewrite my code. I might not have time for that.
Done. It was easier than I expected.
In the Cruiser class he won Lodz with 140 laps. Second Onda Solare with 224 laps. Lodz’s practicality was rated better, so it won. The 84 laps less do not count. Does all this make sense?
If you’re suggesting that practicality is weighted too highly at iESC, I agree. It is, after all, supposed to be primarily a race.
Pingback: European Solar Challenge: Further Analysis | Scientific Gems
Pingback: BWSC 2023 | Scientific Gems