World Solar Challenge: dynamic scrutineering

The table below shows the lap times and speeds (assuming a 2,870 m track) for the World Solar Challenge cars in dynamic scrutineering. These times are now final.

The table also has links to photos and to team social media. The fifth column of the table shows the car class (or, for Cruisers, the number of seats). For more detailed information about the teams, see my annotated teams list. For comparison, the chart (click to zoom) shows 2015 lap speeds. It can be seen that several teams are running substantially slower than in 2015, although Singapore and Nagoya are a lot faster. Overall, speeds are about 93% of 2015 speeds for Challengers, and 90% for Cruisers (qualifying with all passengers aboard seems to have slowed Cruisers down):

2  2:19.5 74.1 kph 14 Cha Michigan 
3  2:14.1 77 kph 4 Cha Nuon 
4  2:48.0 61.5 kph 28 Cha Antakari 
5  2:30.3 68.7 kph 23 2-st Singapore 
7  2:17.3 75.3 kph 7 Cha Adelaide 
8  2:03.8 83.5 kph ★★★ Cha Punch 
9  2:32.1 67.9 kph 24 4-st PrISUm  – see video
10  2:19.4 74.1 kph 13 Cha Tokai 
11  2:16.8 75.5 kph 6 4-st Bochum 
12     Cha Cambridge 
14     3-st Flinders 
15  2:06.4 81.7 kph 3 Cha WSU  – see video
16  2:21.6 73 kph 16 Cha Stanford 
18  4:04.3 42.3 kph 35 Cha EcoPhoton 
20  3:09.4 54.6 kph 31 Cha Durham 
21  3:15.6 52.8 kph 32 Cha Twente  – see video
22  2:26.1 70.7 kph 21 Cha MDH 
23     4-st Tehran 
25  2:04.9 82.7 kph ★★ Cha Nagoya 
28  2:46.6 62 kph 27 Cha KNUT 
30  2:18.5 74.6 kph 9 2-st Arrow 
32  2:24.2 71.7 kph 20 Cha Principia 
34     Cha RVCE 
35  2:22.7 72.4 kph 19 2-st HK IVE 
37  2:38.6 65.1 kph 26 Cha Goko 
38  2:28.4 69.6 kph 22 Cha NWU 
40  2:22.1 72.7 kph 18 5-st Eindhoven  – see video
42  4:03.5 42.4 kph 34 2-st TAFE SA 
43  3:06.6 55.4 kph 30 Cha ANU 
45  2:35.8 66.3 kph 25 5-st Lodz 
46  2:51.7 60.2 kph 29 Cha JU 
49  4:18.1 40 kph 36 2-st Siam Tech 
52  5:06.7 33.7 kph 37 Adv Illini 
53     38 Adv Choctaw 
70  2:15.9 76 kph 5 Cha Aachen  – see video
71  2:19.1 74.3 kph 12 Cha ITU 
75  2:18.6 74.5 kph 10 4-st Sunswift 
77  2:18.3 74.7 kph 8 Cha Blue Sky 
82  2:21.8 72.9 kph 17 Cha KUST 
88  2:20.4 73.6 kph 15 Cha Kogakuin 
94  2:18.8 74.4 kph 11 2-st Minnesota 
95  4:01.5 42.8 kph 33 2-st Apollo  – see video

Advertisement

10 thoughts on “World Solar Challenge: dynamic scrutineering

      • They claim their GPS tracker supplied by race organizers messed with their electrical system, meaning they could not race faster than52kmh. They found the source, I assume they will fix it. But even if they do, do they still have a chance at top 3, they are starting like an hour behind?

      • Frank

        Although teams start at nominal 1 minute intervals in reality the start process is usually much quicker than that. My guess is that they will start around 20 mins behind Punch.

  1. Is it known what the reasons for RVCE and Flinders not passing static scrutineering are? RVCE have become suddenly silent and Flinders mentions a last minute issue.
    Such a disappointment after preparing for so long.

    • Both Flinders and RVCE had reds in the “mechanical” column at scrutineering. I have no idea what the actual problems were, but they must have been unusually serious. Very sad for both teams, obviously.

    • The picture is from 2015, for comparison purposes. Sonnenwagen Aachen didn’t race in 2015. In fact, 2017 is their debut WSC (and I expect them to race very well at it).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.