The World Solar Challenge Cruiser class, for “practical” solar vehicles, has these 12 entries this year:
- 11: Bochum University of Applied Sciences (
Germany, SunRiser)
- 24: Istanbul Technical University (
Turkey, Aruna)
– Withdrawn
- 28: Singapore Polytechnic (
Singapore, SunSPEC4)
- 31: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (
Indonesia, Widya Wahana V)
- 33: Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (
Hong Kong, Sophie V)
- 35: University of Minnesota (
USA, Eos)
- 38: University of Tehran (
Iran, Persian Gazelle III)
- 40: Solar Team Eindhoven (
Netherlands, Stella Lux)
- 43: Ardingly College (
United Kingdom, Ardingly Solar Car)
- 45: KGHM Lodz Solar Team (
Poland, Eagle One)
- 75: University of New South Wales / Sunswift (
Australia, eVe)
- 88: Kogakuin University (
Japan, OWL)
Click on the symbol for detailed team profiles, or on the team social media icons for more information.


Singapore Polytechnic’s SunSPEC4 under construction (top) and Lodz’s Eagle One being unveiled (bottom)
What makes the Cruiser class interesting is that there are different design philosophies that can win. In 2013, Solar Team Eindhoven fielded a futuristic “family car,” while the University of New South Wales / Sunswift fielded a sleek two-seater “sports car.” Here are the 2013 Cruiser class results, calculated according to the formula in the rules (each bar on the left is the sum of the four bars corresponding to the components):
This was the 2013 formula:
This year, the formula is:
That is, the external energy use component has decreased from 18.9% to 15% (also, there is only one opportunity to recharge externally – at Alice Springs), the speed component has increased from 56.6% to 70%, the passenger-carrying component has decreased slightly from 5.7% to 5%, and the practicality-judging component has decreased from 18.9% to 10% (as well as taking design philosophy into account). These changes seem to work against Eindhoven’s “family car” strategy, and in favour of UNSW’s “sports car” approach. Indeed, if the new rules had been applied in 2013, Eindhoven’s “family car” may still have won, but by a much smaller margin, and UNSW would have come at least second.
But that was then; this is now. Bochum has fielded the exciting-looking “ThyssenKrupp SunRiser,” Eindhoven has updated their vehicle (see below), and the field has increased from 8 entrants to 12. Anything can happen!
Note: this page was updated on 29 October 2015 at 10:20 AUS Eastern Daylight Time
Pingback: World Solar Challenge 2015 coming in October! | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 33 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 45 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 11 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 88 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 40 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 75 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 28 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 31 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 35 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 24 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Race coverage | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team Profiles | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 38 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: Team 43 | Scientific Gems
Pingback: World Solar Challenge: the lists | Scientific Gems
Pingback: American Solar Challenge 2016 Updated Status | Scientific Gems